IsraPundit

WE'VE MOVED! IsraPundit has relocated to www.israpundit.com. Click here to go there now.
News and views on Israel, Zionism and the war on terrorism.

March 12, 2003

Subliminal Fisking of Buchanan's "Whose War?"

I have taken Buchanan's puerile piece of parsimony and inserted in bold caps what he meant or was thinking when writing certain words or phrases - his subliminal thoughts. If you have as much bandwidth as I do, you can pick this stuff up. I put a few of my own thoughts in in lowercase bold.


Whose War? JEW'S WAR

A neoconservative clique [JEWS] seeks to ensnare our [NOT THEIR]country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.
by Patrick J. Buchanan
The War Party [JEWS] may have gotten its [JEWS'] war. But it [JEWS] has also gotten something it [JEWS] did not bargain for. Its membership lists [JEWS] and associations [JEWS] have been exposed and its motives [HELPING ISRAEL] challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert [NON-JEW]put this question directly to Richard Perle [JEW]: “Can you assure American viewers ... that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”
Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party [JEWS] is not amused. Finding themselves [JEWS] in an unanticipated firefight [JEWS DONT LIKE FIGHTING], our neoconservative friends [CODE WORD FOR JEWS]are doing what comes naturally [SNEAKY JEWS], seeking student deferments [DRAFT AVOIDING JEWS] from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group [THE JEWS]. People [WIMPY JEWS] who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly [FAGGOT JEWS] in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.
Former Wall Street Journal editor Max Boot [JEW] kicked off the campaign. When these “Buchananites [NOT JEWS BUT REAL AMERCIANS] toss around ‘neoconservative’[JEWS] —and cite names like Wolfowitz [JEW] and Cohen [JEW] —it sometimes sounds as if what they really mean is ‘Jewish conservative.’” Yet Boot readily concedes that a passionate attachment to Israel is a “key tenet of neoconservatism.” [ONLY JEWS CAN LIKE ISRAEL] He also claims that the National Security Strategy of President Bush “sounds as if it could have come straight out from the pages of Commentary magazine, the neocon bible.” (For the uninitiated, Commentary, the bible in which Boot seeks divine guidance, is the monthly of the American Jewish Committee.) [I do not even need to insert Jew here, patty did it]
David Brooks [JEW] of the Weekly Standard wails [CRYING JEW] that attacks based on the Israel tie have put him through personal hell: “Now I get a steady stream of anti-Semitic screeds in my e-mail, my voicemail and in my mailbox. ... Anti-Semitism is alive and thriving. It’s just that its epicenter is no longer on the Buchananite Right, but on the peace-movement left.” [SO BU-CANANITES LOVE JEWS]
Washington Post columnist Robert Kagan[JEW] endures his own purgatory [ALL JEWS GOING TO HELL ANYWAY] abroad: “In London ... one finds Britain’s finest minds propounding, in sophisticated language and melodious Oxbridge accents, the conspiracy theories of Pat Buchanan concerning the ‘neoconservative’ (read: Jewish) hijacking of American foreign policy.”
Lawrence Kaplan [JEW] of the New Republic charges that our little magazine [SEE, I AM HUMBLE, NOT LIKE THE JEWS] “has been transformed into a forum for those who contend that President Bush has become a client of ... Ariel Sharon and the ‘neoconservative war party.’”
Referencing Charles Lindbergh, he accuses Paul Schroeder, Chris Matthews, Robert Novak, Georgie Anne Geyer, Jason Vest of the Nation, and Gary Hart of implying that “members of the Bush team have been doing Israel’s bidding and, by extension, exhibiting ‘dual loyalties.’” Kaplan thunders [LOUD JEW]:
The real problem with such claims is not just that they are untrue. The problem is that they are toxic. Invoking the specter of dual loyalty to mute criticism and debate amounts to more than the everyday pollution of public discourse. It is the nullification of public discourse, for how can one refute accusations grounded in ethnicity? The charges are, ipso facto, impossible to disprove. And so they are meant to be.
What is going on here? Slate’s Mickey Kaus [UNCLE TOM (OR SHOULD I SAY NATHAN?) JEW] nails it in the headline of his retort: “Lawrence Kaplan Plays the Anti-Semitic Card.”
What Kaplan [JEW], Brooks [JEW], Boot [JEW], and Kagan [JEW] are doing is what the Rev. Jesse Jackson does when caught with some mammoth contribution from a Fortune 500 company he has lately accused of discriminating. He plays the race card. So, too, the neoconservatives are trying to fend off critics [ATTACKING THEM NOT FOR STEALING BUT FOR BEING TOO FRIENDLY TO ISRAEL] by assassinating their character and impugning their motives.
Indeed, it is the charge of “anti-Semitism” itself that is toxic {AND I SHOULD KNOW HAVING BEEN CALLED THIS BY BILL BUCKLEY]. For this venerable slander is designed to nullify public discourse by smearing and intimidating foes and censoring and blacklisting them and any who would publish them. Neocons [JEWS] say we attack them because they are Jewish. We do not. We attack them because their warmongering threatens our country, even as it finds a reliable echo in Ariel Sharon [JEWS WITH DUAL LOYALTIES HELPING ARCH JEW].
And this time the boys [JEWISH BOYS] have cried “wolf” once too often. It is not working. As Kaus [JEW] notes, Kaplan’s [JEW’S] own New Republic [JEW MAGAZINE] carries Harvard professor Stanley Hoffman [HARVARD JEW]. In writing [Not in the new republic, Patty is being a bit misleading] of the four power centers in this capital that are clamoring for war, Hoffman [HARVARD JEW] himself describes the fourth thus:
And, finally, there is a loose collection of friends of Israel [JEWS], who believe in the identity of interests between the Jewish state [already there] and the United States. … These analysts look on foreign policy through the lens of one dominant concern: Is it good or bad for Israel? Since that nation’s founding in 1948, these thinkers have never been in very good odor [SMELLY JEWS] at the State Department, but now they are well ensconced in the Pentagon, around such strategists as Paul Wolfowitz [JEW], Richard Perle [JEW] and Douglas Feith [JEW] [THREE DISLOYAL JEWS].
“If Stanley Hoffman [CLEAN HARVARD JEW] can say this,” asks Kaus [JEW], “why can’t Chris Matthews? [NON-JEW]” Kaus [JEW] also notes that Kaplan somehow failed to mention the most devastating piece tying the neoconservatives [JEWS] to Sharon [JEW] and his Likud Party [EVIL JEWS].
In a Feb. 9 front-page article in the Washington Post, Robert Kaiser [JEW?] quotes a senior U.S. official as saying, “The Likudniks [JEWS] are really in charge now.” Kaiser names Perle [JEW], Wolfowitz [JEW], and Feith [JEW] as members of a pro-Israel network inside the administration and adds David Wurmser [JEW] of the Defense Department and Elliott Abrams [JEW] of the National Security Council. (Abrams[JEW] is the [JEW] son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, [JEW] editor emeritus of [JEWS] Commentary, whose magazine has for decades branded critics of Israel as anti-Semites.)
Noting that Sharon [FAT JEW] repeatedly claims a “special closeness” to the Bushites, Kaiser writes, “For the first time a U.S. administration and a Likud [MURDEROUS JEW] government are pursuing nearly identical policies.” And a valid question is: how did this come to be, and while it is surely in Sharon’s [SABRA AND SHITILLA JEW] interest, is it in America’s interest? [my though not patty’s – how come this is surely in Sharon’s interest. Barak and Clinton’s policies were nearly identical on Oslo and it is bad for Israel]
This is a time for truth. For America [DOES NOT REALLY INCLUDE JEWS] is about to make a momentous decision: whether to launch a series [JEWS ARE GOING TO LEAD US INTO OTHER WARS] of wars in the Middle East that could ignite the Clash of Civilizations against which Harvard professor Samuel Huntington has warned, a war we believe would be a tragedy and a disaster for this [NON-JEWISH] Republic. To avert this war, to answer the neocon [JEWISH] smears, we ask that our readers[HOPEFULLY NON-JEWS] review their agenda as stated in their words. Sunlight is the best disinfectant [FOR JEWS]. As Al Smith used to say, “Nothing un-American can live in the sunlight.”
We charge that a cabal [JEWISH ETYMOLOGY] of polemicists [JEWS] and public officials [JEWS] seek to ensnare our [NOT THEIR] country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interests[BUT ARE IN THE INTEREST OF THE JEWS]. We charge them [JEWS] with colluding with Israel to ignite those wars and destroy the Oslo Accords [JOH, YEAH, THE Oslo accords are so vibrant and fill of life]. We charge them[JEWS] with deliberately damaging U.S. relations with every state in the Arab world [ARAB LEADERS, MY KIND OF PEOPLE] that defies Israel or supports the Palestinian people’s right to a homeland of their own [WITH NONE FOR THE JEWS HOPEFULLY]. We charge that they [JEWS] have alienated friends and allies all over the Islamic [oh we have a lot of true friends there] and Western world through their [JEWISH] arrogance, hubris, and bellicosity [PUSHY JEWS].
Not in our lifetimes has America been so isolated from old friends [NON JEWS LIKE GERMANY]. Far worse, President Bush is being lured into a trap [CRUCIFIXION] baited for him by these neocons [ JUDAS LIKE JEWS] that could cost him his office and cause America to forfeit years of peace won for us by the sacrifices of two generations [OF NON-JEWS] in the Cold War.
They charge us with anti-Semitism—i.e., a hatred of Jews for their faith, heritage, or ancestry. False. The truth is, those hurling these charges harbor a “passionate attachment” to a nation not our own [ISRAEL] that causes them [THE IRISH?, NO THE JEWS] to subordinate the interests of their own country and to act on an assumption that, somehow, what’s good for Israel is good for America. … [JEWISH BASTARDS]
(To read the remaining three-quarters of this article What?
visit your local bookstore or newstand Thank G-d)
Copyright March 24, 2003 The American Conservative

In other words Buchanan must be charging these people (otherwise there is no reason to bring it up) of doing what is bad for the US because it is good for Israel. I guess sort of treason. Now this would not really matter except that Buchanan must believe that these Jews, non in real leadership positions, have some how gained control of the leaders in the administration (all non Jews). A little paranoid maybe?